Module 19 - Restitution
Topics
- What is the Subject About?
- Implied Contract
- Change of Position Defence
- The Four Elements of Unjust Enrichment
- Has the defendant benefited or been enriched?
- Was the enrichment at the expense of the claimant?
- Was the enrichment unjust?
- Are there any defences?
- Remedies
- Tracing - Generally
- Tracing – At Common Law
- Tracing – In equity
- Property law and restitution
- Failure of Consideration
- Other Unjust Factors
Cases
- Agip (Africa) Ltd v. Jackson [1990] Ch 265
- Agip (Africa) Ltd v. Jackson [1991] Ch 547 CA
- Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch)
- Avon County Council v Howlett [1983] 1 WLR 605 CA
- Banque Belge pour L’Estranger v. Hambrouck [1921] 1 KB 314 CA
- Banque Financiere de la Cite v Parc (Battersea) Limited [1999] AC 221 HL
- Barlow Clowes International Ltd v. Vaughan [1992] 4 All ER 22 CA
- Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v. Homan [1995] Ch 211
- Bolton Partners v. Lambert, (1889) 41 Ch.D. 295
- Chandler v Webster [1904] 1 KB 493 CA
- Chase Manhattan Bank NA v. Israel-British Bank (London) Ltd [1981] Ch 105
- Chillingworth v Esche [1924] 1 Ch 97 CA
- Clarke v. Shee and Johnson (1774) 1 Cowp. 197
- Clayton’s Case (1816) 1 Mer 572
- Commercial Banking Co. of Sydney Ltd. v. Mann, [1961] A.C. 1
- Derby v Scottish Equitable Plc [2001] EWCA Civ 369; [2001] 3 All E.R. 818 CA
- Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1943] AC 32 HL
- Flood v. Irish Provident Assurance Co. 46 Ir. L. T. 214; [1912] 2 CH. 597
- Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 HL
- Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines (1938) 59 CLR 641
- Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1992] 2 WLR 17 QBD
- In re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd [1995] 1 AC 74 HL
- Jaggard v. Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269 CA
- Jones & Sons (Trustee) v Jones [1997] Ch 159; [1996] 3 WLR 703 CA
- Kelly v Solari (1841) 9 M&W 54
- Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548 HL
- Marsh v. Keating (1834) 1 Bing. (N.C.) 198
- Moses v. Macferlan 2 Burr. 1005
- National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] 1 AC 1175
- Phoenix Life Assurance Co. 2 J. & H. 441
- Procter & Gamble Philippine Manufacturing Corp v Peter Cremer GmbH [1988] 3 All ER 843 (Comm)
- Re Hallett’s Estate (1880) 13 Ch D 696
- Roscoe (Bolton) Ltd v. Winder [1915] 1 Ch 62
- Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500 CA
- Sinclair v Brougham [1914] AC 398 HL
- Slade's Case (1602) 4 Rep. 92b
- Starke v. Cheesman (1699) 1 Ld. Raym. 538
- Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvia Shipping Co [1998] 1 WLR 574 HL
- Surrey County Council v. Bredero Homes Ltd [1993] 1 W.L.R. 1361 CA
- Taylor v. Plumer (1815) 3 M&S 562
- Union Bank of Australia Ltd. v. McClintock [1922] 1 A.C. 240
- Westdeutsche Landesbank Girocentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669 HL
- Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd. v. Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798
